The Ohio Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of the taxpayer in Crown Communications, Inc. v. Testa, 2013-Ohio-3126, who we represented. The Tax Commissioner failed to provide proper instructions to the taxpayer as to how to appeal a final assessment. Rather than appealing to the Board of Tax Appeals, which is the normal appeal procedure for a final assessment, the taxpayer followed the Tax Commissioner’s instructions relating to a preliminary assessment and filed a petition for reassessment with the Tax Commissioner. Holding that the taxpayer had the option to treat the assessment as preliminary (and appeal to the Tax Commissioner) or final (and appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals), the Court agreed with the taxpayer that the Tax Commissioner retained jurisdiction over the taxpayer’s administrative appeal due to the Tax Commissioner’s statutory duty to provide correct instructions.
Ohio Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Taxpayer that Tax Commissioner Retained Jurisdiction Over Administrative Appeal
- Blog, Cases, Ohio State Tax Blog
- 0 mins, 44 secs
Share This:
- January 29, 2026
- 0 mins, 7 secs
Dustin Vrabel and Steve Dimengo were featured in the Crain’s Cleveland Business article titled “Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs [...]
- January 26, 2026
- 4 mins, 45 secs
Akron, OH – January 26, 2026 – Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLC is proud to announce that Dustin [...]
- January 12, 2026
- 0 mins, 12 secs
Partner and Business Practice Group Leader Jon Stefanik authored the article “Tax structuring in M&A: Turning complexity into [...]